Monday, August 22, 2011

Shadow May Be Lifting


CNNMoney reports that the shadow inventory of houses - the inventory of houses that are not on the market but that are in default and may be foreclosed upon - may be lifting sooner than anticipated.  This inventory puts a strain on the already tepid housing market.  Standard & Poor's estimated earlier this year that it would be 52 months before that inventory was exhausted.  S& P has now revised that timeline to 47 months.
S&P said the decline was helped by stabilizing liquidation rates and by fewer borrowers falling behind on their mortgage payments as the economy slowly recovered during the quarter. The firm also said tightened lending standards over the past several years has helped reduce the likeliehood of defaults among recent homebuyers.

Image: Evgeni Dinev / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Mortgage Rates Drop

4.15% for the average 30 year fixed and 3.36% average for a 15 year.

This is a 50 year low, but new buyers must still be skittish and the housing market remains stalled.

30-Year Mortgage Rates Now Lowest Ever, People Still Aren't Buying [consumerist.com]

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

HUD Assistance For Tornado Victims

According to a statement released yesterday, the Department of Housing and Urban Development will soon be offering assistance to families displaced by the recent catastrophic storms in Alabama and Missouri.  HUD will be selling nearly 90 of their REO properties at a discount to public housing authorities in affected areas.  Public housing authorities will then make these properties available for lease or sale to people whose own homes were destroyed in the storms.
“After witnessing first-hand the size and scope of the devastation in Alabama, I knew we must do more,” said [Secretary of HUD Shaun] Donovan. “For the first-time, HUD has designed a pilot program that will bring families affected by a significant disaster closer to stability by quickly providing them with an opportunity to purchase or lease a home. We hope to be able to use this draft purchase agreement as a model to assist other families displaced after a disaster.”
If you live in an affected area and are interested in taking advantage of this program, you should contact your local public housing authority.

Monday, August 8, 2011

Monday Primer: Adverse Possession

In my property class, adverse possession was one of the first doctrines we learned about.  Our property professor became frustrated in the following weeks when we suggested clearing all title issues by waiting twenty years for the adverse possessor to become the rightful owner.  Around that same time I was on a plane with a real estate attorney who told me that in thirty years of practice he had never seen a case of adverse possession.  Until recently, this was a legal doctrine known to 1L law students, but not really relevant to practice or known by the general population (like the Rule in Shelley's Case).  This changed last month when a Texas man decided to use this doctrine to his benefit and adversely possess a bank-owned house that was sitting empty.  This story was picked up by various bloggers and left many readers wondering if they too could profit from this law.

So how does adverse possession work?  This doctrine essentially says that if you sit on a piece of land long enough (traditionally twenty years, but it differs state to state) you become the actual, legal owner of the land.  There are traditionally four elements making up adverse possession and states may have their own statutory requirements.  The four common-law elements are actual entry, open and notorious occupation, hostility, and continuity.  This means that:

1. You must actually enter the property.
2. You must make your presence obvious.  (You can't enter secretly or hide in a shed for twenty years unfindable and then claim the land is yours.)
3. You must be there without the permission of the owner.  Your presence must be hostile to the owner's title.
4. You must occupy the land steadily for twenty years (or whatever the statutory period is in your jurisdiction).  This does not mean that you can never leave the land, but rather that you use the land as continuously as any normal owner would.  If the actual owner boots you off the land, the clock stops running and you would have to re-enter and start over.

States have there own additional requirements in addition to these.  In Alabama these requirements are outlined in section 6-5-200 of the Alabama Code.  In Alabama the time for adverse possession is ten years, and in addition to the common law requirements, the adverse possessor must have done one of three things:
1. Recorded a deed to the property ten years ago
2. Paid property taxes for ten years or
3. Inherited the property from an adverse possessor who was in position one or two.

Looking at Alabama's statute (and many other states have similar requirements).  You can see the risk of being an adverse possessor.  An adverse possessor can hold a property for nine years, eleven months, paying property taxes the entire time, be ejected by the actual owner on the last day, and find himself possessing nothing.

Thursday, August 4, 2011

Estoppel By Deed


*Note: This legal doctrine is unrelated to my previous post on estoppel letters.  Lawyers love reusing words to indicate different concepts.  It keeps everyone on their toes.

This question just came up while examining a chain of title:
An over-zealous seller transferred property to the buyer BEFORE the seller actually owned it.  The seller acquired the property the next week, and the deed granting ownership to the seller was recorded before the deed granting ownership to the buyer.  So the chain as recorded looked like this:

Owner -> Seller -> Buyer

But in actuality was this:

January 1: Seller->Buyer
January 7: Owner -> Seller

The question is, does the buyer own the property even though the seller had no title to transfer when he transferred title to the buyer.

The answer is yes.  Because of the legal doctrine of Estoppel By Deed.  This is a common sense doctrine (something we should all be pleasantly surprised to see in American property law).  The seller can't claim good title when selling the property and then deny that he had title at the time of transfer and keep the property for himself. Without this doctrine, the law would provide the buyer with the legal remedy of suing the seller to demand a new deed.  Instead, the court saves everyone time and money by treating the seller's good title as if it reaches back to the original deed and stopping him from claiming otherwise.

Tuesday, August 2, 2011

What Is An Estoppel Letter And Why Does It Matter?

If you are a tenant and your landlord has sold the building or been foreclosed upon, you may have received an estoppel letter asking you to affirm that a lease is in place and all parties are in compliance.  Ira Meislik has a post on his blog Real Estate Law and Ruminations explaining estoppel letters and how they might trump the facts.  He warns recipients who know that their landlords are violating the lease.
What’s the lesson? Don’t jump so fast to assume that an estoppel letter is innocent. It isn’t a pro forma task. It requires investigation. The party giving it has to realize that what is “says” may turn out to be a replacement for the “real facts.” 
If you have been sent an estoppel letter, Meislik's post is a good read before you sign anything.

Monday, August 1, 2011

Watch This Auction

The Sacramento Bee reports on a local real estate agent posting an unsold listing on eBay.

A clever gimmick, but be careful.  Buyers: a quick search of real estate being sold on on-line auction sites shows some less than legitimate looking listings.  Make sure you investigate before you bid.  Agents: this may be a good way to get in touch with potential buyers, but it is unlikely that an eBay auction would meet your state's requirements for a binding real estate contract.